Bucky Breeder
2017-12-30 21:05:24 UTC
I'm looking for a term used to describe a common generalization fallacy.
When someone says "Rosie is a pig" and the response is "He's attacking all
women therefore he's a misogynist"; or when someone says "Comey was a
crooked cop" and the response is "He's attacking all law enforcement
therefore he's undermining our law enforcment institutions"; or someone
says "They are fake news" and the response is "He's attacking the First
Amendment and our free press"; etc. Those are broadly stroked widely cast
generalizations from the minutia and very specific event to a vast category
which is essentially incorrect (fallacious) logic.
It seems there is a very specific term for this type of hyperbole, but I
cannot recall what it is. Any semanticists, syntacticists or pramagticists
out there who recall that part of middle-school English classes?
Thanks in advance.
When someone says "Rosie is a pig" and the response is "He's attacking all
women therefore he's a misogynist"; or when someone says "Comey was a
crooked cop" and the response is "He's attacking all law enforcement
therefore he's undermining our law enforcment institutions"; or someone
says "They are fake news" and the response is "He's attacking the First
Amendment and our free press"; etc. Those are broadly stroked widely cast
generalizations from the minutia and very specific event to a vast category
which is essentially incorrect (fallacious) logic.
It seems there is a very specific term for this type of hyperbole, but I
cannot recall what it is. Any semanticists, syntacticists or pramagticists
out there who recall that part of middle-school English classes?
Thanks in advance.
--
I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;
Resolve conflicts the American way :
Rock - Paper - Scissors - Twitter War - Concealed Firearm
... and I approve this message!
I AM Bucky Breeder, (*(^;
Resolve conflicts the American way :
Rock - Paper - Scissors - Twitter War - Concealed Firearm
... and I approve this message!